Moms Clean Air Force
banner_19
 Donate Facebook Twitter  Pinterest RSS
  • Home
  • Blog
  • ABOUT
    • Who We Are
    • Our Targets
    • Partners
    • Leadership Circle
    • Our Bloggers
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Press
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Armed with the Facts
    • Asthma
    • Clean Air Rules and Regs
    • Coal
    • Heat and Extreme Weather
    • Indoor Air Pollution
    • Mercury
    • Natural Gas
    • Social Justice
  • STATES
    • Our Field Team
    • Michigan
    • New Hampshire
    • North Carolina
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Utah
  • Take Action

5 Tips For Cleaner Fires From A Chimney Sweep

Posted on December 11, 2012 by Moms Clean Air Force|Posted in: asthma, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, pollution|
Follow @MomsCAF">

Baby in front of fireplace

This post was written by Kiera Butler for Mother Jones and used with permission:

It’s no secret that fireplaces and woodstoves—wonderful and cozy though they may be—are not great for the environment. The smoke that they produce is full of harmful particles, including, according to the EPA, volatile organic compounds and the likely carcinogen benzo(a)pyrene. Smoke can foul up the air both inside and out, and exposure to the stuff can cause serious respiratory problems.

So should you board up your hearth for good? Not necessarily. The right equipment can help, as can proper burning techniques.

To find out exactly how to make the most efficient fire possible, I enlisted the help of Clay Thompson, a working chimney sweep based in Sacramento, California. According to the Chimney Safety Institute of America, there are about 5,000 working chimney sweeps in the United States. You may be as disappointed as I was to learn that Thompson, who has been sweeping six chimneys a day five days a week for 13 years, says that unlike that other notorious chimney sweep, Mary Poppins’ boyfriend, he sings only in the car and never dances. Also, he uses brushes instead of, you know, climbing on in. “Most modern chimneys are only six inches wide,” he says. “I don’t know how Santa does it.” Anyway, here are Thompson’s tips:

1. If you have a fireplace, consider an insert. A fireplace insert is like a wood-burning stove that fits right into your fireplace. EPA-certified models burn 70 percent more efficiently than an open fireplace.

2. 
Upgrading to new equipment could save you money. If your fireplace insert or stove was made before 1992, you might want to consider a newer, EPA-certified model. Although they can be pricey, the agency-approved stoves and inserts not only produce less smoke and soot, they’re also 50 percent more efficient than traditional models—so you’ll end up spending less on fuel. They’re also much easier to clean, says Thompson: “I dread those old inserts. They weigh 600 pounds, and then there’s six to eight inches of soot inside. You can’t even see anything, and it takes two and a half hours. I have to change my clothes after that. I work as a chimney sweep but I don’t like getting dirty.” For several years, people who upgraded their fireplaces and wood stoves qualified for a federal tax credit, but that program expired this year. Some states offer their own programs; the Alliance for Green Heat lists them here.

3. Burn the right kind of fuel. Rule of thumb: The cooler your fire, the more particulate emissions and soot it produces. In order to ensure that your fire is hot enough, Thompson recommends using only wood that has been “seasoned” (dried) for at least a year. Hard woods (like maple, ash, oak, and beech) burn hotter than soft woods (pine and fir). Most importantly, never burn wet wood. Pellet stoves, which take bricks made of compressed wood or other organic materials, generally burn cleaner and more efficiently than woodstoves or fireplaces. This EPA chart compares particle emissions from various heat sources:

Heat source particle emissions chart

Image courtesy of EPA


4. Use the right sized grate for your fireplace.
“A lot of people buy a grate that is too big for their fireplace and then spread out the logs,” says Thompson. For the hottest and hence cleanest-burning fire possible, “you want those logs all bundled together in the center.”

5. Skip the home chimney-cleaning remedies. There are a bunch of old wives’ tales about DIY chimney sweeping; Thompson says that several of his customers have tried to clean their chimneys by starting a fire with potato peels or rock salt. “Those don’t seem to work.” Another bad idea: “Some people try to start a chimney fire to clean their chimney,” he says. “Sometimes it does clean it, but sometimes it burns your house down.” For newer model fireplace inserts and stoves, Thompson recommends a professional inspection and sweeping about every two years, or one cleaning for every cord of wood burned. But if you have older equipment, or if you regularly burn wood that isn’t properly seasoned, you could end up needing a sweeping much more frequently. Thompson’s company charges $149 for a one-story sweeping, but prices vary by region.

It should also be noted that the while fuel stoves in the United States are often considered ornamental, Europeans are increasingly using pellet stoves as a primary source of heat. The Alliance for Green Heat points out that these stoves produce fewer climate-warming greenhouse gases than fossil fuels.

Wood and pellet stoves are far from the only hearth-based heat contraptions available. If you’d like to geek out on hydronic heaters, masonry heaters, and more, the EPA’s site on appliances is a good place to start. Want to compare efficiency and emissions of various models? Go further down the rabbit hole with Cornell Cooperative Extension’s extremely thorough guide.

TELL EPA TO SET STRONG SOOT REGULATIONS

Posted in: asthma, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, pollution|
  • Ernest Grolimund

    JOIN EDF IN REQUESTING STOVE STACK STD REVIEW BY EPA
    EDF and other env groups are requesting the EPA tighten stack stds for certified stoves. The ALA is writing that 88% of certified stoves emissions are unhealthy and so their emissions should be made less as required by NSPS law. These stds were supposed to be reviewed every eight years but have never been reviewed, till now.
    Logically, if 88% of the certified stoves are unhealthy per ALA, then the old stoves common in NH are very unhealthy. If the certified stoves allow 100 mcg/m3 pm2.5 conc's in nightly inversions, and the safe dose for wood smoke pm2.5 is 180 mcg/m3,hr , per ATSDR, then it is 2 hours or less to unhealthy conditions that must be stopped and prevented per DHHS policy for essential services.
    NH mobile monitoring shows community wide pm2.5 at 100 mcg/m3 in Keene NH. But the pm at houses is about 300 mcg/m3 from old stoves per EPA and BAAQMD modeling in ME and CA. Just cleaning old stoves and certified stoves is not enough to solve this problem. They have to be removed following recommendations from the U.N. to phase out all cordwood burning fast. Changeout programs are too slow. London solved the London Fog Air Pollution Disaster problems from fireplaces by banning fireplace use. Keene should do the same and consider banning the old stoves to prevent health problems and even consider banning certified stoves unless the emission factor is equal to oil emission factors. Otherwise, the city is going the wrong way on air pollution and warming and mercury deposition problems in fish.
    This is not just a Keene problem or a NH problem. NH is just ahead of the country in discovering this problem and should be commended for its work so far. Both Keene and NH should call in the EPA and ATSDR like NY and Michigan have done to stop this very bad air pollution problem. The constitution requires it and it requires changing the old rules and laws too if they are no longer protective. This is the job of the legislature and congress but informed people have to communicate their concerns to the politicians or they will not know about the problem. They have thousands of issues facing them and it takes a united voice to get their attention. EDF leaders are dong their part, so I ask EDF rank and file to add to that voice.

  • Smoke kills

    Ban all wood burning period Wood Smoke is toxic. http://burningissues.org/forum/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2091

132,000 Moms strong!

Get updates and action alerts

JOIN US

SEARCH

View full-size

MORE FROM OUR BLOGGERS

  • Posted on May 17, 2013 by Jeannette Kaplun|Posted in: asthma, pollution| ¡Libro electrónico gratis! Factores desencadenantes del asma: una guía para padres, maestros, médicos y enfermeros
  • Posted on May 16, 2013 by Dominique Browning|Posted in: asthma, pollution| Free E-Book! Asthma Triggers: A Guide For Parents, Teachers, Doctors And Nurses
  • Posted on May 15, 2013 by Moms Clean Air Force|Posted in: pollution| Teach Kids About Energy Efficiency And Clean Air
  • Posted on May 14, 2013 by Lori Popkewitz Alper|Posted in: Toxics| Couch Detective: My Hunt For A Chemical-Free Couch
  • Posted on May 14, 2013 by Moms Clean Air Force|Posted in: Event| You're Invited! Asthma Twitter Chat (with Prizes!)

read all posts

Bienvenidos! En español

CATEGORIES

  • activism
  • African-American Community
  • asthma
  • autism
  • Cancer
  • Cartoon
  • Cement
  • Clean Air Act
  • Clean Air Rules and Regulations
  • Climate Change
  • coal
  • Colorado
  • dads
  • Economics
  • En Español
  • Event
  • food
  • Guest Bloggers
  • Heat and Extreme Weather
  • Indoor Air Pollution
  • Latino Community
  • Mercury Poisoning
  • Michigan
  • Motherhood
  • Natural Gas
  • New Hampshire
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Partners
  • Pennsylvania
  • politics
  • pollution
  • Pregnancy
  • religion
  • renewable energy
  • resources
  • schools
  • Science
  • social justice
  • Soot
  • Texas
  • Toxics
  • Utah
  • Videos
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy policy
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on http://pinterest.com/momscaf/Follow Us on Google+Follow Us on FlickrFollow Us on RSS